Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680 2,389 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 168 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 574 54% 450 Pts	64-Core 1,265 78% 1,265 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.56 3% 4.02 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 2.87 3% 4.12 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 207 193 108 109 139 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.8% Above average	Read 223 Write 210 Mixed 173 SusWrite 161 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 35.6 117% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 34.3 DQ Write 71.6 DQ Mixed 44.8 36% 50.2 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 123%
Adaptec Array 2.5TB 4.5TB free Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 319 318 318 316 317 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 221GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 101 105 106 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 102 69% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 112%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 101 105 106 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 158 Write 154 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 102 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 MXIC 25L3205 60GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.1% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 20.7 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	4x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	2x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	2x

SSD
EP1-KB480 480GBLiteonBench 80%, 17 samples	4x
MX100 512GBCrucial $200Bench 88%, 31,545 samples	2x
530 Series 180GBIntelBench 71%, 4,011 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT351V7BMR4C-H9 HMT35... 108GBHynixBench 38%, 12 samples	4x
HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 MXIC 25L3205 60GBHynixBench 52%, 23 samples	3x
M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B5273CH0-YH9 M393B5273CH0-YH9 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 M393B5273CH0-YH9 M393B5273CH0-YH9 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 M393B5273CH0-YH9 M393B5273CH0-YH9 Hynix HMT31... 132GBSamsungBench 40%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16