Monster TULPAR T5 V13.1

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V13.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V13.1
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '19 at 08:50
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	21%
CPU Throttled	60%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 54 2-Core 108 51% 80.2 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 301 31% 248 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 8503) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.38% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 1.41 1% 22.6 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.38% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 288 311 145 111 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 371 Write 306 Mixed 260 SusWrite 227 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 17.1 68% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 267 198% 260 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B CB8GS2400.C8ET 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	64.4% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 21.9 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V13.1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V13.1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	29x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	21x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	17x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	10x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	4x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16