Lenovo 20AWA18EUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20AWA18EUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWA18EUS
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 04:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 180
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 245
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 6.59
3% 5.74 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.91
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 415 406 372 373 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 390
Write 382
Mixed 262
SusWrite 386
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 25.5
93% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 127
154% 272 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 18.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback