Asus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 04:03
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 260
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 825
78% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 63.3
56% 68.8 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 67.3
55% 66.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 900 828 777 739 705 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,327
Write 1172
Mixed 941
SusWrite 835
240% 1,069 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 65.1
213% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,288
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,156
879% 1,186 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 224%
Great: 389%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
880GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 87 81 89 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 85.9
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
399GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 72.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 50.7
45% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 134 131 132 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 74.2
Write 129
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 133
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
189% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
386GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43% Average
Read 93
Write 94
Mixed 81
SusWrite 112
131% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 24.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $815
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback