Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160127
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 02:09
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700K-$298
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.9% Very good
1-Core 116
2-Core 210
78% 163 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 613
63% 494 Pts
64-Core 604
41% 604 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 345
Reflection 328
Parallax 379
91% 350 fps
MRender 219
Gravity 345
Splatting 227
93% 264 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 114%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,668
Write 595
Mixed 459
197% 907 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 56.4
225% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,157
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 866
710% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 237%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$106
44GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 112
Write 118
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 93
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59%
Great: 112%
WD WD2003FZEX-00SRLA0 500GB
84GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 430 388 212 143 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 474
Write 418
Mixed 380
SusWrite 288
290% 390 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.2
10,443% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
3,302% 362 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 66%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$229
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 22.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 5,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $780
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback