Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 00:40
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 98
1-Core 162
2-Core 324
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,170
109% 908 Pts
64-Core 1,808
112% 1,808 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
506GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1690 1683 1702 1688 1704 1226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,541
Write 1,668
Mixed 1322
SusWrite 1,615
399% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 82.5
267% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,019
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 847
639% 864 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 323%
Great: 355%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
687GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1511 1511 1510 1515 1514 1513 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,528
Write 1,542
Mixed 1,118
SusWrite 1,512
321% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 77.1
261% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 755
DQ Mixed 274
329% 571 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 267%
Great: 295%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
378GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1797 896 581 584 590 589 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,004
Write 1,713
Mixed 715
SusWrite 840
293% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 58.3
204% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 758
588% 813 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 232%
Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 188 190 192 190 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 138
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 186
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 41.7
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 32.5
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
119% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 71%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.3 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Read 15.4
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6.1
9% 7.68 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 25.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 32
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 46.2
87% 46.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $787
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback