Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2L

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2L (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 22:54
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5405 719 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 71.4 40% 59.5 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 122 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 138 9% 138 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3751) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 21.7 18% 20.5 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 22.7 Splatting 17.3 17% 22 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 29 22 25 72 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.6% Very poor	Read 62.5 Write 12.5 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 31.8 9% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 13.2 49% 13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 55%
WD WD1600BB-22GUC0 160GB 782 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 14GB free Firmware: 20.00K20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 42 44 44 44 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 36 Write 34.8 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 43.2 26% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.4 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-G31M-ES2L Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2L

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	40x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	31x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	42x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	24x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	7x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	378x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	52x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $137

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16