PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 7.8 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 12 '19 at 22:13 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS240G2G0A-00JH 240GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 101 38 58 57 44 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
50.3%
Above average
|
||||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
41GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 115 109 106 115 103 MB/s
|
62.3%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
152GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
234GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 568x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 533x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 487x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 270x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 154x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 135x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 72x |
A400 480GBKingston $37Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |