Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 20:48
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	76%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4510U 63,054 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 151 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 221 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 5.65 Parallax 6.19 3% 5.08 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 6.74 4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 371 322 326 322 325 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 448 Mixed 320 SusWrite 351 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 48.3 155% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 348 257% 339 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 123%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 57GB free Firmware: AM003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 60 60 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 71.1 Write 69.3 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 59.7 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L50-B Builds (Compare 838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

CPU
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	239x
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	139x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	120x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	575x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	187x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	29x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	21x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	164x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	110x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16