Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 94.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 246 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 431 56% 424 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 39.4 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 38 32% 36.4 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 38 Splatting 36.3 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 440 Write 347 Mixed 111 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 28.7 91% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 92.6 DQ Mixed 114 106% 169 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 192GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 108 137 140 138 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 158 Write 159 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 131 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 113%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 414GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 86 87 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 57.5 Write 36.7 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 85.5 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB 1,739 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 24.1 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 23.9 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,115x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	639x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	554x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	841x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	469x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	367x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	312x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	162x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	156x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	112x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16