bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DQ67SW
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111111
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 20:15
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$221 18,756 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 179 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 476 52% 402 Pts	64-Core 472 32% 472 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$145 623,459 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 40.3 31% 36.3 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 35.3 22% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$54 455,217 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 497 493 491 410 359 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$89 24,133 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 288GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 77 77 78 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 74.8 Write 57 Mixed 43 SusWrite 77.3 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 44%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 120GB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 81GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 34 Write 32.2 Mixed 33 SusWrite 33.6 45% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 10.5 853% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 11.1 DQ Write 17.5 DQ Mixed 12.7 1,068% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.1% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 74%, 206,596 samples	1,550x
Core i7-2600Intel $199Bench 71%, 117,289 samples	1,360x
Core i5-2400Intel $75Bench 69%, 117,870 samples	915x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 89,622 samples	1,229x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $145Bench 30%, 623,459 samples	1,071x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 93,396 samples	707x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 229,896 samples	782x
A400 120GBKingston $20Bench 60%, 112,132 samples	472x
Virtual NVMe Disk 275GBParallelsBench 202%, 585 samples	444x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 355,933 samples	982x
4x2GBUnknownBench 24%, 134,190 samples	619x
1x4GBUnknownBench 24%, 121,917 samples	387x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250	Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $181

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16