Teclast F15

Performance Results

Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTeclast F15  (all builds)
MotherboardTECLAST F15
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 110
40% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 197
27% 197 Pts
64-Core 197
13% 197 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 2.25
2% 2.28 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 0.04
2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NA950-2280 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 116 30 45 25 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 384
Write 291
Mixed 273
SusWrite 97.7
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 9.1
67% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 93.7
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 23.5
62% 125 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F15 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Teclast F15

The Best.
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback