Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 177 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 587 57% 470 Pts	64-Core 700 43% 700 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMJ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 157 158 157 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 318 Write 152 Mixed 211 SusWrite 159 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 18.1 66% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 20.7 DQ Mixed 21.6 17% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 95%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 931GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 107 107 106 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 28.9 Write 108 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 108 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5773CH0-CH9 M391B1G73QH0-CMA Micron 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F M391B5773CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U7BFR8A-H9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1866, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.7% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 8.3 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16