Lenovo 20EX000DLM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20EX000DLM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EX000DLM
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 14:40
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 81.1
41% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 136
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5116) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 6.06
3% 5.81 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 7.26
5% 5.81 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$82
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 311 270 288 333 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 393
Write 333
Mixed 323
SusWrite 298
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 31.6
105% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 120
121% 196 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 3 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 17.6
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 10.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback