Asus P6T

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 13:53
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 95.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 210 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 594 59% 482 Pts	64-Core 723 45% 723 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Nvidia(10DE 0804) 768MB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Lighting 13.8 Reflection 14.8 Parallax 10 11% 12.9 fps	MRender 19.9 Gravity 15 Splatting 14.9 13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 53 53 54 54 54 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48% Average	Read 245 Write 180 Mixed 201 SusWrite 74 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 20.6 83% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 142 120% 173 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 87%
HP M700 120GB 1,660 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 78GB free Firmware: Q1117B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 54 38 39 38 38 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.7% Average	Read 248 Write 228 Mixed 151 SusWrite 73.2 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 15.9 73% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 27.8 53% 107 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 98%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 60GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 29.2 Write 6 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 13.8 21% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 4.4 366% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 18.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 13.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 54.5 73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	569x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	145x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	51x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	224x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	124x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16