Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180319
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 12:39
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 258 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 758 76% 621 Pts	64-Core 752 47% 752 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Asus(1043 0464) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	30% Poor	Lighting 37.1 Reflection 35.5 Parallax 47.4 30% 40 fps	MRender 31.2 Gravity 34.8 Splatting 40.1 30% 35.4 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 156 76 147 160 89 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 498 Write 436 Mixed 370 SusWrite 145 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 36.4 132% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 188 181% 285 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 547GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 96 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 108 Write 101 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 97.2 68% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE 1x8GB 357 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 13 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 54.8 73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	94x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	88x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	39x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	15x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16