Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FA
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190503
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '19 at 23:08
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 53.2 1-Core 96.9 2-Core 176 60% 109 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 432 46% 367 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 81%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 837GB free (System drive) Firmware: JU004C SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 93 101 58 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 81.5 Write 134 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 76.9 54% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.3 88% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 10 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,607x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,504x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	497x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	424x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	414x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	278x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	717x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	431x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	399x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16