PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX (all builds) |
Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121016 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Nov 11 '19 at 22:37 |
Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 259 260 242 276 291 MB/s
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
173GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 216 231 226 228 242 MB/s
|
94.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
87GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 84 87 88 87 89 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 119x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 75x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 66x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 32x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $527 |