Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 22:25
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 660
75% 589 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 38.8
37% 38.8 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 42
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 310 310 310 310 311 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,513
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,023
SusWrite 462
301% 1,365 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 86.1
296% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,496
DQ Mixed 1,012
829% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 275%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
238GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 479 479 483 483 483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 477
Mixed 427
SusWrite 476
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 55.7
207% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 129%
Great: 131%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
265GB free
Firmware: 3B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 95.8
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 64%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
710GB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 148 155 155 154 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 153
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
325GB free
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 81 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 76.6
Write 81.6
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 81.6
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-132.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 30.5
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $773
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback