Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 79.1 2-Core 159 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 509 49% 406 Pts	64-Core 797 49% 797 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 853B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.05 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.04 1% 1.08 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 11,317 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 910GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 243 159 79 246 288 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 358 Write 354 Mixed 93 SusWrite 216 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 1.6 8% 3.6 MB/s	DQ Read 7.6 DQ Write 8.7 DQ Mixed 7.4 6% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 445%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSZF51272DZ1G1F1 36JSZF51272DZ1G1F1 36JSZF51272DZ1G1F1 36JSZF51272DZ1G1F1 36JSZF51272DZ1G1F1 36JSZF51272DZ1G1F1 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 36JSZF51272DZ1G1F1 32GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.8% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16