PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 8.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121109 |
Uptime | 31 Days |
Run Date | Nov 11 '19 at 18:58 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 71% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
73.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 5750
XFX(1682 2980) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
|
8.57%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 82 85 89 88 84 MB/s
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
169GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 91 90 MB/s
|
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
24GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 62 64 63 65 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 15 15 15 MB/s
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 434x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 318x |
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples | 173x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 104x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 93x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 83x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $1,018 |