Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A12-8830B R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 230 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Memory 26.8 1-Core 32 2-Core 85.8 26% 48.2 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 137 20% 143 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 6,884 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5120) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.12.06 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 6.94 4% 6 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 4.73 Splatting 5 4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 304 301 273 285 350 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 530 Write 271 Mixed 362 SusWrite 302 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 21.9 73% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 207 156% 210 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 236%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB 4,876 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 18GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 7.9 7.1 5.5 6.4 7.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 6.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6.4 11% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 60% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB 42,779 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 274 15% 274 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16