To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive5.83% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 18:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 420
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Memory 20.9
1-Core 5.3
2-Core 19.1
10% 15.1 Pts
4-Core 17.7
8-Core 18.5
2% 18.1 Pts
64-Core 24
2% 24 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 44%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$31
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 27 21 23 22 32 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.83% Terrible
Read 72.7
Write 22.1
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 26.6
10% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.3
4% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
9.31% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.7
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 314
13% 314 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.31%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback