| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Asus V-P8H67E (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK V-P8H67E |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110309 |
| Uptime | 4.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 11 '19 at 17:14 |
| Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.6%
Very good
|
73% 123 Pts
|
49% 392 Pts
|
29% 468 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B4) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
15% 18.4 fps
|
18% 21.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 54 64 61 63 61 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
51% 68.3 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
637GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
|
22.4%
Poor
|
33% 24.4 MB/s
|
168% 2.07 MB/s
| |
|
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
3GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 6.3 8.2 8.1 8.1 7.2 MB/s
|
5.5%
Terrible
|
12% 11 MB/s
|
12% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905403-181.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
51.5%
Above average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
65% 61.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical V-P8H67E Builds (Compare 141 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus V-P8H67E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 40x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 25x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 19x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $220 |