Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9880H 11,095 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 78.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 817 78% 647 Pts	64-Core 1,385 86% 1,385 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 860F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.59% Terrible	Lighting 6.53 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 7.91 5% 24.5 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 16 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.59% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB 20,439 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 12 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	443x
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples	194x
Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples	162x

SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples	95x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	86x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	84x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	252x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	89x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GBMicronBench 88%, 2,294 samples	27x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16