Zoostorm 7200-5383A

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5383A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME H270-PRO
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161122
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '19 at 22:26
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 188 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 376 44% 341 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.12 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.3% Average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 44.6 39% 49 fps	MRender 61.1 Gravity 47.4 Splatting 60.7 46% 56.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98 11,843 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 175 52 61 61 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 537 Write 325 Mixed 381 SusWrite 106 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 98.8 4K Mixed 42.9 150% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 174 148% 210 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 604GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 141 138 141 145 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 151 Mixed 92.3 SusWrite 142 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.2% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21.5 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 17.7 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5383A Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Zoostorm 7200-5383A

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	11x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	4x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	4x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	2x

SSD
Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCorsair $164Bench 314%, 35,257 samples	5x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x

RAM
CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 32GBCorsairBench 77%, 15 samples	5x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	4x
KHX2400C15/8G KHX2666C16/8G 16GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,403 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16