Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 129 65% 103 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 272 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3986) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Lighting 5.87 Reflection 7.85 Parallax 5.09 5% 6.27 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 12.7 7% 8.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RTNTE256PCA8EADL 256GB 308 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFR12.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 209 213 227 226 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 507 Write 442 Mixed 74.6 SusWrite 196 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 31.1 113% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 75.5 109% 203 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB 1,974 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	114x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	13x

SSD
RTNTE256PCA8EADL 256GBBench 72%, 308 samples	19x
MZYTY256HDHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,555 samples	10x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	7x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	45x
RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 38%, 13,320 samples	18x
RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 1x4GBRamaxelBench 30%, 1,356 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16