Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 158 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 385 39% 315 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000M 1,114 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 1630) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	8.74% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 8.97 8% 10.3 fps	MRender 14.1 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 11.4 10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.74% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 256GB 2,468 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM05H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 364 359 363 358 364 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 403 Write 341 Mixed 268 SusWrite 355 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 17.8 62% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 97.5 DQ Mixed 146 117% 168 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples	234x
Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples	37x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	36x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
PM830 256GBSamsungBench 66%, 2,468 samples	12x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	10x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $276

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16