Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160317
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '19 at 09:12
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$40 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 117 2-Core 207 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 322 42% 317 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 44.6 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 41.9 36% 39.1 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 40.9 Splatting 36.3 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 123 132 128 134 97 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.6% Poor	Read 227 Write 87 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 128 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 9.6 40% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 65GB free Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 190 67 68 68 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 466 Write 276 Mixed 313 SusWrite 136 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 31.6 138% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 171 153% 227 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 243GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 124 Write 128 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 105 69% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MLH64V1H 2x4GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 22.3 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 23.3 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	50x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	40x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	36x

RAM
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 3,078 samples	15x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	14x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $89

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16