To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 08:23
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 123
57% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 425
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 44
Parallax 39.2
36% 42.5 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 35.6
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L3 EVO SSD 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM50.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 29 24 24 3.8 19 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.5% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 216
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 26.6
17% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 17.3
68% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 84.5
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 60.9
58% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 85%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
227GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 68 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 81.2
Write 66.5
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 67.2
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 47%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
107GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 78.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 57.7
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- M393B5170GB0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170GB0- 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 30
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 8.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback