Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 22:19
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 84
2-Core 160
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 496
46% 382 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1382 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 88.9
55% 75.7 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 56
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,018
Write 3,396
Mixed 3,345
799% 3,586 MB/s
4K Read 242
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 173
670% 189 MB/s
DQ Read 593
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 520
389% 520 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
54GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 232 216 216 182 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 425
Write 390
Mixed 294
SusWrite 226
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 33
113% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 225
178% 246 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
75GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 98 96 98 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 145
Write 141
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 97.1
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 163 168 168 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 168
Mixed 38
SusWrite 168
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback