Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 586
58% 471 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B E208) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 61.4
40% 47.5 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 40.3
33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 295 295 286 208 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 490
Mixed 399
SusWrite 269
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 60.9
208% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 198
165% 232 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
80GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 296 296 295 295 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 484
Mixed 421
SusWrite 305
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 61.5
209% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 247
196% 267 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
227GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 427 426 430 446 334 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 490
Mixed 460
SusWrite 406
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 58
197% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 104
150% 279 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 175 175 174 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 149
Mixed 90.9
SusWrite 174
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) Builds (Compare 980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback