Asus X555QA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation 19%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus X555QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555QA
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190510
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
38.2% Below average
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 113
43% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 185
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 195
13% 195 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 122E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 26.4
5% 21.7 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 14
5% 13.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$42
672GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 96 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 79.2
Write 83.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 96.7
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X555QA Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation 22%

System: Asus X555QA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback