Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '19 at 18:04
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 110 2-Core 194 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 307 41% 308 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.4% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 29 Parallax 35.8 29% 33.5 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 35.7 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 120GB 3,411 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 73 68 70 69 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 424 Write 280 Mixed 239 SusWrite 103 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 83.7 4K Mixed 8.4 94% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 82.4 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 13.3 47% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 85%
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 26GB free Firmware: S8FM08.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 154 155 154 155 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.2% Above average	Read 248 Write 156 Mixed 145 SusWrite 154 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 98 4K Mixed 13.7 110% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 56.3 67% 115 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 1x8GB 1,337 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 11.4 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	720x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	479x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	305x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	392x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	252x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	128x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16