Asus F1A75-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 16:20
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon II X4 651
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
37.9% Below average
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 114
40% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 216
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 198
13% 198 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Lighting 103
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 119
27% 99 fps
MRender 79.3
Gravity 107
Splatting 80.4
30% 88.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$25
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 166 205 201 226 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 366
Write 277
Mixed 291
SusWrite 205
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 31
114% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 41.4
39% 59 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
194GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 90
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$130
73GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 86 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 51.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 87
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$40
60GB free
Firmware: SD22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 26.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 71
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 9.8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F1A75-M PRO Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback