Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 10:35
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770K-$500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.6% Good
1-Core 118
2-Core 171
72% 144 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 536
55% 433 Pts
64-Core 576
39% 576 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,060
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Lighting 538
Reflection 590
Parallax 789
141% 639 fps
MRender 530
Gravity 644
Splatting 310
182% 495 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 179%
Great: 197%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 312 332 345 331 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 878
Write 389
Mixed 384
SusWrite 326
109% 494 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 29.8
115% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 291
245% 356 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 107%
Great: 391%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 184 180 184 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 252
Write 228
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 182
132% 183 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
294% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 125%
Great: 239%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
786GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 92.7
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 106
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 83 84 86 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 82.7
Write 82.3
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 85.3
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 2,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti $155Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback