Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Memory 79.2 1-Core 54.9 2-Core 87.1 49% 73.7 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 140 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	5.24% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 7.42 Parallax 6.12 5% 6.65 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 5.43 Splatting 7.78 5% 6.28 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.24% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Smar tbuy 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 59 235 244 165 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 353 Write 240 Mixed 157 SusWrite 170 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 1.5 8% 4.27 MB/s	DQ Read 59.6 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 66.3 73% 118 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 11.7 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 329 samples	8x
CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GBUnknownBench 33%, 7 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples	4x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16