| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190529 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 09 '19 at 05:06 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81%
Excellent
|
86% 159 Pts
|
79% 648 Pts
|
59% 955 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
16% 28.7 fps
|
51% 60.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 167 153 150 142 132 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
86% 382 MB/s
|
194% 69.4 MB/s
|
267% 356 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.6%
Good
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,551 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 1,947x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 435x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 403x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 285x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 283x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 247x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 107% - Outstanding | Total price: $635 |