To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 03:42
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.3% Above average
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 137
48% 103 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 678
63% 513 Pts
64-Core 863
58% 863 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 271
Reflection 220
Parallax 235
71% 242 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 230
Splatting 168
62% 181 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 260 132 13 21 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 453
Write 381
Mixed 315
SusWrite 110
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 62.6
DQ Write 26.5
DQ Mixed 0.7
12% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 98%
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB
280GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 130
Write 118
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 111
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 98%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$47
352GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 135 133 135 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 139
Write 133
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 131
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
78GB free
Firmware: CC31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 78 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 79.8
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 32.5
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 7,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $56
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback