Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3670 APU 2,400 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 76.9 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 84.7 45% 68 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 170 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D 4,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Elitegroup(1019 3158) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 5.92 Parallax 3.84 4% 4.77 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 3.13 Splatting 5.26 4% 4.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 301 299 299 297 290 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 411 Write 304 Mixed 266 SusWrite 297 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 19.6 74% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 75.6 DQ Mixed 128 100% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 198GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 94 92 93 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 118 Write 99.2 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 91.8 69% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 5,634 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.3% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13.9 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 86.4 46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16