Asrock Z270M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161114
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7600K-$251
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.4% Good
1-Core 115
2-Core 168
70% 142 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 354
46% 338 Pts
64-Core 297
20% 297 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$445
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 373
Reflection 362
Parallax 417
98% 384 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 380
Splatting 238
101% 282 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$70
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 46 50 45 51 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 427
Write 266
Mixed 296
SusWrite 76.1
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 38.3
152% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 107
130% 229 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 90%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$60
82GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 335 318 317 317 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 454
Mixed 461
SusWrite 324
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.3
212% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 123%
Great: 131%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 7.4 8.3 8.3 7.7 7.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 7.4
10% 9.28 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 9%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
699GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 167
Write 119
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 103
153% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z270M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $983
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback