Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 23:53
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.1% Good
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 161
60% 126 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 678
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 1,205
81% 1,205 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$1,096
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Lighting 293
Reflection 274
Parallax 323
77% 297 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 274
Splatting 190
74% 213 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 968 848 854 853 855 854 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,130
Write 1,193
Mixed 1,192
SusWrite 872
247% 1,097 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 42
139% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 558
412% 548 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 166%
Great: 280%
WD WD3000FYYZ-DATTO-1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01KD2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 161 162 162 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 161
Mixed 104
SusWrite 160
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 95%
WD WD3000FYYZ-DATTO-1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01KD2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 154 154 155 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 153
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
60.9% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 19.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 68%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $2,151
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback