Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '19 at 20:16
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 130 2-Core 239 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 830 77% 640 Pts	64-Core 1,010 62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Gigabyte(1458 2311) CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56% Above average	Lighting 68.9 Reflection 76.4 Parallax 96.1 56% 80.5 fps	MRender 74.5 Gravity 71.1 Splatting 61.2 56% 69 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 247 245 240 237 233 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,935 Write 1,408 Mixed 1,115 SusWrite 278 263% 1,184 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 53.8 176% 58.7 MB/s	DQ Read 966 DQ Write 496 DQ Mixed 700 528% 720 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 280%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 242GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 48 44 42 48 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 50.9 Write 49 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 44.6 36% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 65%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 802GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 124 123 123 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 124 Write 104 Mixed 90 SusWrite 123 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.1% Good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 20.2 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 16.2 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	564x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	252x

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $1,384

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16