Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime7 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-4170-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.3% Above average
1-Core 108
2-Core 184
70% 146 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 288
39% 286 Pts
64-Core 290
20% 290 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 14.6
3% 13.3 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 18.5
4% 13.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 120
Write 70.4
Mixed 59.4
62% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
161% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 4,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $340
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback