Acer Aspire Z3-451

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAcer Aspire Z3-451  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z3-451
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161026
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A10-5757M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22.8% Poor
1-Core 42
2-Core 80.5
29% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 128
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
V-GEN09SM19EG120GBIT 120GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 79 51 54 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 433
Write 353
Mixed 338
SusWrite 98.1
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 1
47% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 6.4
27% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 76%
Toshiba MK1255GSX H 120GB
88GB free
Firmware: FG001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 61 62 57 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 68.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 60.1
41% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown A1_ A1_ 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire Z3-451 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z3-451

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $34
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback