Gigabyte GA-A75M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 20%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A75M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 16:01
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20% Poor
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 59.7
26% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 73.6
8-Core 78.5
10% 76.1 Pts
64-Core 90.9
6% 90.9 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 6.8
6% 17.5 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 21.3
6% 21.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$38
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 87 91 111 79 107 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 208
Write 133
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 85.2
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 4.3
25% 7.93 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 17.2
15% 21 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$29
130GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 68 66 79 62 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 95.1
Write 86.9
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 65.7
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 70%
WD Elements 1TB
60GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 51 47 64 50 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 72.9
Write 35.8
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 50
60% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.4
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-A75M-S2V Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A75M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $151
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback