Nexcom NISB 3500M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemNexcom NISB 3500M  (all builds)
MotherboardTo To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 13:54
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.3% Below average
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 107
44% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 155
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Device(0000 0000) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2104
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2.1
0% 2.13 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 3
0% 2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 96 90 96 91 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 131
Write 118
Mixed 117
SusWrite 94.2
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 18.2
76% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 71.4
DQ Mixed 22.6
24% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$9
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.4 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 5.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
476GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 20.7
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 18.9
28% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905402-172.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NISB 3500M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Nexcom NISB 3500M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $84SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback