ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nexcom NISB 3500M

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Nexcom NISB 3500M (all builds)
Motherboard	To To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '19 at 13:54
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 117 52% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 160 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2104 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 0.76 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 96 90 96 91 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.2% Below average	Read 131 Write 118 Mixed 117 SusWrite 94.2 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 18.2 76% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 71.4 DQ Mixed 22.6 24% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 83%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.4 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 5.7 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 6 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 22%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 476GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 20.7 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 18.9 28% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-172.A00LF 2x2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.3 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback