Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook S15 X510UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UF
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 11:47
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 496
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1131) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4112
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
7.85% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 9
8% 8.89 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 8.7
8% 10.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.85%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 412 392 422 425 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 365
Write 251
Mixed 186
SusWrite 410
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 15.2
82% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 80.7
64% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
297GB free
Firmware: SBFA13.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 110 108 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 361
Write 206
Mixed 234
SusWrite 128
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 12.5
60% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 26
33% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 102%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
248GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.9% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 40.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 14.7
7% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 14.8
50% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 24
DQ Mixed 24.5
18% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 89%
Toshiba THNSNK128GVN8 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: 3203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.6% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 38.5
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 14.2
7% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 7.9
31% 9.63 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 13.8
11% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 74%
Lacie P9227 Slim 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 34
Write 33
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 14
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ BL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: A905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 36
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 41.1
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 63%
USB30 2TB
789GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 34.9
Write 32.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 43.8
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
164% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate USB 1TB
931GB free, PID a014
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 38 40 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.5% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 30.9
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 38.5
42% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFD824A.M16FF 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.5
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook S15 X510UF Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback