HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory6 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 10:08
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$34
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 66.2
28% 55.6 Pts
4-Core 62.2
8-Core 74.7
9% 68.4 Pts
64-Core 101
7% 101 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
POV(1ACC 4411) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 10.7
3% 11.3 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 8
4% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
76GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 17 16 19 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 41.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 22.1
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 47 54 66 68 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 76.4
Write 75
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 59.8
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $56
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback