Asus 1011PX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus 1011PX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015PE
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110506
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 09:05
Run Duration1551 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom N570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.38% Terrible
1-Core 11
2-Core 21.8
8% 16.4 Pts
4-Core 20.4
8-Core 26.5
3% 23.5 Pts
64-Core 18
1% 18 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$56
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 65 69 68 73 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 59.2
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 60.2
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
9.48% Terrible
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 0.1
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $208Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback